Which of the following alternatives may replace traditional labels according to regulations?

The framework of Hazard Communication (HazCom) emphasizes the importance of clear communication regarding hazardous chemicals in the workplace. According to the regulations, traditional labels can indeed be supplemented or replaced by alternatives that convey critical safety information effectively.

Among the options provided, pictographs are specifically designed to provide visual representation of potential hazards, ensuring comprehension across various literacy levels and language barriers. This method aligns with the Globally Harmonized System (GHS) of Classification and Labeling of Chemicals, which advocates for standardized symbols that can help workers quickly understand the risks associated with a substance.

While operating procedures and batch numbers can be very informative, they do not serve the primary purpose of labeling, which is to communicate hazard information quickly and effectively. Therefore, relying solely on these details would not meet regulatory standards for replacing traditional labels, whose primary goal is immediate recognition of hazards through standardized warnings and symbols.

In summary, the adoption of easy-to-understand pictographs as a labeling alternative enhances the effectiveness of hazard communication by providing quick visual cues that inform users of the risks presented by chemical substances, thus aligning with safety regulations.